Skip to content

How to Contribute to a GSoC Organization (After Choosing One)

First: Understand This Clearly

❌ GSoC is not about the number of PRs ✅ GSoC is about useful, trusted contributions

5 bad PRs = zero value 2–3 good PRs = very strong signal

What Counts as a “Good” Contribution?

A good contribution:

  • solves a real problem the org cares about
  • is reviewed and merged
  • follows project standards
  • shows understanding of the codebase

This is what mentors look for.

Step-by-Step: How Contribution Actually Works

1️⃣ Start by Understanding the Project’s Problems

Before coding:

  • read open issues
  • read discussions
  • ask mentors:

“What problems need help right now?”

Best contributors solve pain points, not random tasks.

2️⃣ Pick the Right Issues (Very Important)

Good issues for GSoC contributors:

  • good first issue
  • help wanted
  • small bugs
  • documentation gaps
  • test failures
  • performance issues

Avoid initially:

  • huge refactors
  • core architecture changes
  • unclear tasks

3️⃣ Talk Before You Code

Before starting an issue:

  • comment on it
  • explain your approach briefly
  • ask if you can take it

This prevents:

  • duplicate work
  • wasted effort

Mentors appreciate this.

4️⃣ Make Thoughtful Pull Requests (PRs)

What a strong PR looks like:

  • focused on one problem
  • clean commits
  • follows style guide
  • includes tests (if required)
  • explains why, not just what

5️⃣ Handle Reviews Like a Pro

Reviews are normal.

Good behavior:

  • respond politely
  • fix issues quickly
  • ask clarifying questions
  • don’t argue emotionally

How you handle review matters as much as the code.

6️⃣ How Many PRs Are “Enough”?

Realistic truth:

  • 2–3 strong PRs → good chance
  • 4–5 solid PRs → very strong
  • 10+ tiny PRs → suspicious / low value

Mentors prefer:

fewer, meaningful contributions

7️⃣ Non-Code Contributions Also Matter

These count if they are useful:

  • improving documentation
  • fixing build/setup issues
  • adding tests
  • helping users in discussions
  • reviewing PRs

Especially good early contributions.

8️⃣ Show Consistency (Not a One-Time Spike)

Better:

  • small contributions every week

Worse:

  • many PRs in one week, then silence

Consistency builds trust.

9️⃣ Solve Problems They Actually Face

Ask questions like:

  • “Is this issue blocking a release?”
  • “Is this something users complain about?”
  • “Can I improve this workflow?”

Solving real pain makes you memorable.

10️⃣ Connect Contributions to Your Proposal

Later, in your proposal:

  • reference your PRs
  • explain what you learned
  • show how your project builds on this work

This makes your proposal believable.

How the Contribution Phase “Works” (Mentor View)

Mentors evaluate:

  • reliability
  • communication
  • learning speed
  • problem-solving
  • collaboration

Not just code.